Thursday, June 2, 2011

In fashion, anything goes? Even the blatant copying?

The extent to which a brand can copy a large low-cost signature? There should be a boundary line that defines how far they can push the big chains like Zara and H & M with their replicas? Entering a Zara and find themselves in the draft version of collezionePradain low cost is not hallucinating? The brand is copied or has affected the advertising copy? And how do you flaunt a blatant copy of Zara, for example, a collection of a fashion trend that made? Where is the respect for the creator of that? Stella McCartney, Miu Miu and Prada are currently some of the most copied brands, the absurdity is that it often makes reproducing the original creation offering versions of the same trend is not only far more accessible but also easy to wear.

The question must be asked at this point is another: the need for quality or to be trendy? If your goal is to be fashionable you can be while wearing a copy of which reproduces the same trend. Even if the fabric is of poor quality and the seams are ripped in the end if the fashion changes every year, why should they last longer? Aware that we can show off a robbery fake Prada show off what we want.

If what interests us is wearing an article of quality that falls well then we have to focus on the brand. But talking about fashion and luxury brands where does the value of that bonus if you wear one copy in the same way?

No comments:

Post a Comment